[Chapter 9, post #12]
“The Eagles’ consultation with a
committee composed of members of several faiths in order to find a nonsectarian
text underscores the group’s ethics-based motives.”[1]
Justice
Stephen Breyer
The question raised by Myth #10 is whether the Eagles-donated Ten Commandments monument on the Texas State Capitol grounds is “sectarian.” A sectarian Ten Commandments monument would be one whose text of the Ten Commandments is: “narrowly confined or devoted to a particular sect.”[2] This issue most frequently arises before the courts in legislative prayer cases – that is, challenges to the practice of opening legislatures and local boards with a prayer to solemnize the meeting.[3]
Justice Breyer took a bite of the Eagles’ poisonous apple and provided the pivotal fifth vote in Van Orden v. Perry. One of Justice Breyer’s rationales for finding no Establishment Clause violation was that a committee of clergy had developed nonsectarian version of the Ten Commandments. Some justices are of the view that under our Constitution government is permitted to advance religion as long as no single religion is preferred.[4] I suppose that Justice Breyer was counting Judaism, Christianity and Islam as diverse religions eventho they are derivative of the religion of Abraham.
I discussed the “committee” more fully in the chapter Ruegemer Soars On Eagles Wings. The essence is this – Judge E.J. Ruegemer established a local[5] committee of Jewish, Catholic and Protestant clergy to draft a nondenominational version of the Ten Commandments. He believed that such universality would give him cover for the conspiracy he was about to undertake – collusion with state and local governments to violate the civil liberties of Americans – getting permission from governmental entities to erect tombstones to Jesus Christ on public property and proselytize “God’s law.”
It is not surprising that the version of the Ten Commandments that Ruegemer’s committee came up with most closely resembles the Catholic version in that the numbering of the first three commandments being man’s obligations to God[6] and the “covet” commandments are split in two as the ninth and tenth commandments. Judge Ruegemer was a devout Catholic.
To many, it does not matter which version of the Ten Commandments is in the public square – as long as “God’s law” law is there for everyone to see.[7]
To others, the version matters. Often, parents do not want their children being indoctrinated in a religion different from their own – even a different Christian denomination. This may seem exaggerated to some. It is not. In May and July of 1844, for example, Philadelphia experienced the Bible Riots following nativist groups spreading a rumor that Catholics were trying to remove the Bible from public schools. Numerous deaths and injuries resulted, as well as, the burning of several Catholic churches.[8] Again, the version matters a lot to some people.
And to others, the Eagles-donated Ten Commandments monuments placed on courthouse lawns, public parks and public schools represent a violation of the principle of separation of church and state embodied in the First Amendment and should be removed.[9]
Justice Breyer suggests that the Texas monument is nonsectarian. Clearly, Justice Breyer either ignored reality or didn’t do his homework in this case. Hardly could the Ruegemer committee take multiple versions of the Ten Commandments, mix them all together and produce a universal version. Instead, what the committee produced was an “Eagles version” of the Ten Commandments.[10] It turned out not to be so universal after all, inasmuch as, over the two decades of the program, the aeries erected multiple versions of the Ten Commandments on courthouse lawns, public parks and school yards.[11]
To summarize the salient facts:
1.
In 1940, the Supreme Court held that the Free Exercise
Clause of the First Amendment applies to the states.[12] Then, seven years later, the Court held that
the Establishment Clause applied to the states. [13]
2.
Aware of this, Judge Ruegemer was concerned that
selecting either the Jewish, Catholic or Protestant version of the Ten
Commandments would be construed as “sectarian” and violate the Establishment
Clause. He needed a scheme to circumvent
the First Amendment that had recently been made applicable to the states,
including his state of Minnesota.
3.
Judge Ruegemer established a St. Cloud, Minnesota
committee of Catholic, Protestant and Jewish clergy to develop a universal version
of the Ten Commandments for the Eagles Ten Commandments program. There were no persons on the committee from
non-Jewish minority faiths or persons without religious belief.
4.
Judge Ruegemer was a devout Catholic.
5.
There are three major versions of the Ten Commandments,
differing in both numbering and wording.[14]
6.
The Jewish, Christian and Protestant faiths number the
Ten Commandments differently. For
example, the version adopted by the Ruegemer Committee[15]
follows most closely the Catholic numbering system wherein (a) the religious
commandments comprise the first three commandments, (b) the secular commandment
“Honor thy father and thy mother” is the fourth commandment and (c) the two “covet”
commandments are separated as commandments nine and ten.[16]
7.
Early Eagles-donated Ten Commandment monuments did not
include “Thou shalt not make to thyself any graven images,” thus making those
monuments more closely identifiable with the Catholic version.[17]
8.
Some early Eagles-donated monuments reflect the
Catholic numbering.[18]
9.
The numbering and lack of the “graven images commandment
on early Eagles-donated Ten Commandments monuments raised serious concerns
about their sectarian nature. Subsequently
monuments generally dropped the numbering and included the “graven images” commandment
in order to be more Protestant friendly, including the 1961 Ten Commandments
monument located on the Texas State Capitol grounds.[19]
10. As
mentioned previously, the wording of the Ten Commandments varies among
religions. For example, in the Jewish
version of the sixth commandment God commands: “You shall not murder”;
whereas, the King James version, God commands: “Thou shalt not kill.” Many people gloss over this distinction as
being trivial. However, it is important
to some people as an identifier of which version of the Ten Commandments is
being displayed. All of the
Eagles-donated Ten Commandments monuments that I am aware of use “kill,”
suggesting a Catholic-Protestant preference.
Justice Stevens summed it up this way: “Moreover, despite
the Eagles’ best efforts to choose a benign nondenominational text, the Ten
Commandments display projects not just a religious, but an inherently
sectarian, message.”[20]
[1] Van Orden v. Perry, 545 U.S. 677, 701
(2005) (Breyer, concurring in the judgment).
[2] Dictionary.com, adjective, definition 2. Available at http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sectarian.
[3] The Supreme Court held in Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783 (1983),
held that government funding for chaplains was constitutional because of the
“unique history” of the United States.
[Note: the Court had previously held in Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963) that
school-sponsored Bible reading in public schools to be unconstitutional.]
[4] The
“nonsectarian” rationale flies in the face of McCreary County v. ACLU of Ky., 545 U.S. 844, 860 (2005), decided the same day as Van Orden, which held that “First
Amendment mandates governmental neutrality between religion and religion, and
between religion and nonreligion.”
[5] St. Cloud, Minnesota.
[6] The second commandment in the Protestant
version is: “Thou shalt not make to thyself any graven images” – is not part of
the Catholic version. As a concession to
Protestants, the committee appended it to the first commandment. The Protestant version, the “covet”
commandment s are combined. It should
also be noted that the Hebrew version uses the word “murder” instead of “kill.”
[7] As an Atheist, the Biblical story of God
giving Moses tablets of the Ten Commandments on Mount Sinai is a myth and,
therefore, the various versions are of no significance to me. The critical point is that government is prohibited
by the First and Fourteenth Amendments from displaying the Ten Commandments in
the public square.
[8] See Philadelphia
Nativist Riots at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Nativist_Riots. “During the 1840s, students in Philadelphia
schools began the day with reading the Protestant version of the Bible. On November 10, 1842, Philadelphia's Roman
Catholic Bishop, Francis Kenrick, wrote a letter to the Board of Controllers of
public schools, asking that Catholic children be allowed to read the Douai
version of the Bible, used by Roman Catholics. He also asked that they be
excused from other religious teaching while at school. As a result, the Board of Controllers ordered
that no child should be forced to participate in religious activities and
stated that children were allowed whichever version of the Bible their parents
wished.” “After the riots, Bishop
Kenrick ended his efforts to influence the public education system and began
encouraging the creation of Catholic schools, with 17 being founded by 1860.”
[9] To Separatists, the Eagles-donated Ten
Commandments monuments are inherently religious and, therefore, their presence
on public lands violates both the Supreme Court’s Lemon and neutrality tests.
[10] I assume that the 1951 Brown and Bigelow
20x26 inch design incorporated the committee’s version of the Ten
Commandments. In that year, the
Minnesota state aerie distributed “more than 7,000 smaller replicas of the
framed Ten Commandments.” Hoffman, The Real History of the Ten Commandments
Project. Hoffman calls the Eagles
version “a universally acceptable translation of the Ten Commandments.”
[11] Eagles historian and member Sue A Hoffman
that “some criticism surfaced because of the different versions of the Ten
Commandments and their numbering.
Changes were made after the first series of distributions regarding the
numbering and wording of the Ten Commandments based on the Interdenominational Public School Format of 1958. Some aeries still chose to keep the numbering
system even after the change was offered.”
The Real History of the Ten
Commandments Project, of the Fraternal Order of Eagles (2005), available at
http://www.religioustolerance.org/hoffman01.htm.
[12] Cantwell v.
Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296
(1940).
[13]
Everson v. Board of Education,
330 U.S. 1 (1947).
[14] Jewish, Catholic and Protestant. Altho Islam is an Abrahamic religion, there
is no formal Islamic version of the Ten Commandments.
[15] This conclusion assumes that the text adopted by the committee is reflected in the design by the artists of Brown and Bigelow who prepared the original decorative 20x26 inch version of the Ten Commandments. See Sue A. Hoffman, The Real History of the Ten Commandments Project of the Fraternal Order of Eagles (2005) available at http://www.religioustolerance.org/hoffman01.htm. [Note: Ms. Hoffman is a member of the F.O.E. She has identified over 150 Eagles-donated monuments in 34 states while researching for a book on the Eagles Ten Commandments Program.]
[16] See photograph of an early 1950s Eagles Ten
Commandments poster at http://wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blogs/poptheology/files/2012/10/10-C-Front.jpg. Also note the two tablets at the top with
Roman numerals I-III on the left tablet and IV-X on the right tablet are
consistent with the Catholic faith. This
confirms the Catholic preference and sectarian nature of the Eagles Ten
Commandments program. In the Jewish and
Protestant faiths, the first four commandments are religious and the last six
are secular.
[17] For example, the Denver, Colorado (1955),
Helena, Montana (1956), Boone County, Indiana (1957) and Connellsville,
Pennsylvania (1957) do not include the “graven images” commandment.
[18] For example, Denver, Colorado (1955), Helena,
Montana (1956), International Peace Garden (1956) (on the boarder of North Dakota
and Canada), Boone County, Indiana (1957), Connellsville, Pennsylvania (1957) (image
available at http://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/heraldstandard.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/2/33/233b509d-253a-5812-9fe3-661bf02923b8/514ce5cf0c3af.image.jpg.,
Gastonia, North Carolina (1957) and Xenia (Greene County), Ohio (1957) (image available
at http://www.flickr.com/photos/rubenrodz/1488741490/sizes/o/).
[19] A photograph of the Eagles-donated Austin,
Texas Ten Commandments monument is available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ten_Commandments_Monument.jpg.
[20] Van
Orden (Stevens, J., dissenting), at 717.
No comments:
Post a Comment